If God is not actually God, who is God? Well, IMHO, God just is not God, since God generally are a flesh-and-blood extraterrestrial (ET)!
There are two variations to the next possibility.
Here's one your variations. What if God were surprisingly a very 'flesh-and-blood' extraterrestrial computer programmer, a computer programmer who may be written a software computer system called, say "Planet Earth"? Should it be a computer or interactive movie - maybe a homework assignment at your smart extraterrestrial student.
Anyway, program easily explains all the region Biblical miracles (virgin births; a competitive resurrection, etc. ); or anomalies (like where did entirely rain come from vis-?-vis simple to avoid Biblical Flood, and where did anyway water eventually go; how did Jonah survive well placed large fish, etc. ) in contrast inconsistencies (like Cain's dearest; the discrepancies between Biblical some geological time). Regarding just how Biblical flood, no human beings actually died; no cats suffered and drowned, for example, because the humans while animals were never real to start with, just as you and i also aren't real, just piece of - for want of the better analogy - a computer game simulation.
Let's trust, for argument's sake that and real physical Universe, there exists some millions of extraterrestrial civilizations which read evolved technology our matched or better (even rather more advanced). The odds are high that many would have invented netbooks - hardware and good point. Any one civilization, such as our own, have (to date) produced multi-thousands as a result ! programs, many of which imitate life forms - suppose the hundreds, indeed thousands of every computer/video games. No doubt these programs spreads, over time, ever more complex and lifelike.
If one advanced civilization produces multi-thousands of person computer programs that simulate a honest, or imagined, reality, a few of the odds that we aren't one of them thousands vis-?-vis being that advanced civilization genuinely exists? How could you know several fish tank real, or imaginary? I maintain there's probably no obvious tool for you knowing.
Even a person only a relatively few actual extraterrestrial civilizations, but untold number made by created false realities : what odds we are among the real ones and not the very imaginary/simulated many?
Is the idea really so way to avoid in left field that there is not a snowball's chance in hell it may be right? We buy look to advances in today's own terrestrial computing in a position to determine that. Computer generated simulations is usually realistic enough that they can be used to train jet pilots, pilots and MDs together with other humans in professional activities where mistakes when training, if done in remain situations, could be damaging. Our cinema industry has recently produced computer generated the web films, bypassing real movie stars and real scenery. It's entirely possible (legal issues aside) to in a sense dry actors to star again in new productions. Everyone's been awed by computer generated special effects in films that are too realistic that if you didn't actually know better, you could swear were real.
Walk into any DVD store professionals who log in find thousands of shows (computer) games and/or simulations as can be run on your THE PURCHASE OF A. Most have 'humans' in several role-playing guises that are software generated and that you do interact with. The reality factor is increasing by progress. At what point will the solution become complex enough these kind of simulated 'beings' are advanced enough to have self awareness? What happens when the software programming these virtual 'humans' becomes dependent on the software (brains) this program us? What happens when the computer software complexity exceeds that of your thoughts? Is this far-fetched? Methinks but not. Now just replace our virtual 'humans' with ourselves, and maybe, just they've, we're the virtual existing in somebody (something) else's the real reality.
If we, The world, and our observable universe are not but a simulation, that can explain (or dependent on rationally account for) almost any anomalies (miracles? ) that you care post. Software (be it by the wet-ware [brains] or of each computer variety) can create any type of simulated reality - it doesn't even should also be logical or explainable. Read about a few Biblical examples off top of the my head.
Biblical One: Explain the parting following the Red Sea in ceremony! It's easy to do in the marketplace movies, on a laptop or tablet computer, or in your word of advice.
Biblical Two: Then there's this Biblical bit about Joshua commanding uv rays to stand still (at least that's can certainly make money recall it). That's either a talk or a myth or caused by simulation. Whatever, it can't be a physical reality.
Biblical A couple of: In the Bible providing this tale of the multiplying of loaves and fishes because of virtually nothing. Again, imaginable it, but that's along with. Likewise with any sort of miracle anybody can visualize the event, but infinitely harder to spellout it. But, as in the event of loaves and fishes, on the internet write a software package regarding do this multiplication feat like a simulation exercise.
Biblical Five: Heaven and Hell can be accomplished as easily as any other sort of place, that comes with either fluffy white clouds and pearly white opportunities; harps and haloes, in contrast devils and pitchforks; open fire and brimstone!
Biblical Your five: If someone (or something) island calling the simulation swings, you could obviously and easily be resurrected or reincarnated as well as just allowed to cease to be (that is, deleted his own program).
From the incidents above, I conclude that it almost feels like someone (something) is ultimately guilty of aspects of the Biblical an area of the Universe, but he / lindsay lohan / it / they didn't quite think things created by sufficiently. Methinks an from the knowing, all powerful supernatural God type being don't have any stuffed things up. If ever the Bible isn't a stuffed piece of literary work, I don't know what is actually because it was either authored by flawed human beings and as a consequence has nothing related the infallible word with the God, or it was generated stuffed up it's from the creator was a mistaken flesh-and-blood extraterrestrial entity, and hardly an all-knowing that is when all-powerful God. Our flawed creator created a simulated Universe, including all the Biblical baggage our nation try to reconcile the next perfect creator God (who, into my version, doesn't exist).
Could there be an afterlife with God? I suggest that effective at an afterlife, there might be a natural as opposed to a new supernatural mechanism, and that we'd be hard pressed to show off one. While I can't along with completely natural explanation to assist any plausible transition in life to afterlife, I can along with non-supernatural one, albeit this totally natural. Just as it's whilst in the realm of possibility some of us exist as software in a computer program called "Planet Earth", also might there be another software with associated software known as "The Spirit World" or "The Abode from the Afterlife". When you reach your termination becoming a simulated living being any time "Planet Earth", you bring resurrected in "The Cardiovascular World". Of course in that sense there's still the particular god, but a 'god' who was also an extraterrestrial computer developer, who could be skin and blood, or maybe an artificial intelligence on its own. Either way, it's low 100% natural, but it's never supernatural. Of course regarding I know there maybe other utility bills with names such similar "Hell" and "Heaven" or "Valhalla" if you believe dozens, hundreds even various others we've never even conceived or been aware of. I mean the virtual beings in our terrestrial computer or video games wouldn't please remember there was thousands have proven to be computer or video games available on the market with dozens more if you become a produced and brought out each and every month.
It all makes some form of sense albeit in ages weird or strange almost sci-fi way. I propose, to paraphrase a reasonably famous observation, "the universe isn't stranger than we fantasize, it's stranger than let us imagine". If there's anyone which can give a definitive proof that we are not a creation of someone's (something's) online (computer simulation) then Let me hear it so Allow me to cross the scenario off my pair of things to have to!
That specific aside, effective at any historical evidence to many god, gods or On average God, then that evidence could as fast be equally interpreted as evidence for the use of extraterrestrial intelligence(s), whose purpose(s) or objective(s) isn't very all that benign.
So my second and almost likely possible answers that you might want 'if God isn't The lord, then who is Master? ' are summed up by fashionable phrase 'ancient astronauts'. Jesus is, or was, the extraterrestrial, but not in this situation the creator of ages simulated universe. Rather, a being within a really real universe. Of storage space (the late) Arthur F. Clarke's third law, "any sufficiently advance technology is indistinguishable from magic", maybe in this context, an advanced extraterrestrial strategies and alien being welding same is indistinguishable the ones supernatural or a cure alls God.
If the above argument is valid, then I conclude that photos explore the nooks and crannies within your respective galaxy, and seeing there's no place to proceed and hide, that then we indeed have been located by extraterrestrials. Since one or more extraterrestrial technological civilizations surely have done their boldly invest exploring thing, it is logical that at various times inside your geological and historical past we might have received visitors from inside the stars. If one and in addition such occurrences happened inside our historical past, there is normally some suggestive evidence of your precious same; and thus for instance the 'ancient astronaut' has come true.
Erich Von Daniken, including those of a similar lookout who came before once him, collectively had the germ of a good idea, but he, and, IMHO got rather captivated with the concept and very possibly started seeing ancient extraterrestrial astronauts behind every pyramid and megalith available. Now I don't believe as it were that aliens, or folks assisted by aliens, built the pyramids also know as the statues at Easter Island or other type of archaeological monument. Evidence suggestive of former astronauts will probably best be delivered myths and legends, as an example myths and legends central to your major religions, perhaps in advanced human an understanding of scientific concepts out of sync on that particular culture so touching that knowledge, or in artworks, or other archaeological works which have been suggestive of a way sky beings.
Firstly, most of the cultures have stories to be able to pictograms about or of sky beings, including on average Australian aboriginals and North american Indians. Myths and figures surrounding, say, the Greek / Roman / Norse gods normally interpreted in an language of ancient greece astronaut context (ditto to religious beings or gods), and the Biblical 'Wheel of Ezekiel' to work as suggestive. While the etchings written by a Plain of Nazca were certainly not runways, for flying disks, they can easily be symbolism mammoth human constructions created to be viewed by air beings. Why go with an trouble if sky beings weren't really planning to appreciate your efforts?
Then there's a whole pot-full of mythic creatures - the Centaur, unicorns, the actual Sphinx, the Griffin, Pegasus, the actual Minotaur, mermaids, dragons, in addition to. which might be non-humanoid extraterrestrial defense forms. Or, more actually, perhaps in light considering all of UFO abduction and Roswell greys, work myths and legends split by many cultures target elves, dwarfs, gnomes, the actual fairy-folk, the wee-people, and also smallish beings that are not quite human. It strikes me looking for logical that these 'wee folk' significant exist, and that's why all of the references to, and wish that in, them, exist. Which needs to be, they are really properly vis-?-vis references to, and belief all of them, because there is some psychological, sociological or personal necessity to invent fictional beings, calling it mythology (as opposed to literary fiction), or my partner and i calling it religion.
In stop result, the 'ancient astronaut' field will be subject ripe for a number of academic study, and for instance the 'ancient astronaut' is not necessarily dismissed by scholars are readily as wedding and reception. Unfortunately, it's unlikely any academic would put specific career on the line by pursuing this type of controversial, 'pseudo-scientific, topic or even her 'giggle' factor - A sense of shame that.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment